how to select the three desitred Directorate-Generals

rena_sim wrote:I just did that..I am really dissapointed.

Don't worry, maybe you still have a chance to be chosen!

Rena_sim.. I wouldn't worry either, I think it would be more dramatic if you would have forgotten to add a document.



I was wondering if anybody has an answer on this question I posted:

I have a question concerning the draft and the chronological order of the studies.
When checking out my draft I saw that in the upper right corner some numbers appear:
the preferred DG / and then a number.

My question is about this number. It is the same as a number next to my Bachelor study 'field of study/specialisation'. Is there a logical connection between these two, or is this a coincidence? The number for my Master is different.

Did I understand correctly that chronological order of the studies, means that first ones oldest study should be mentioned, and below we should mention our latest (most recent) study?

Wouldn't it be more logic if the number in the upper right section of the form would be my latest study?

Does anybody have any idea?

(the doubt before submitting my online application! )

len wrote:Rena_sim.. I wouldn't worry either, I think it would be more dramatic if you would have forgotten to add a document.



I was wondering if anybody has an answer on this question I posted:

I have a question concerning the draft and the chronological order of the studies.
When checking out my draft I saw that in the upper right corner some numbers appear:
the preferred DG / and then a number.

My question is about this number. It is the same as a number next to my Bachelor study 'field of study/specialisation'. Is there a logical connection between these two, or is this a coincidence? The number for my Master is different.

Did I understand correctly that chronological order of the studies, means that first ones oldest study should be mentioned, and below we should mention our latest (most recent) study?

Wouldn't it be more logic if the number in the upper right section of the form would be my latest study?

Does anybody have any idea?

(the doubt before submitting my online application! )

Actually I don't know, but I don't think the chronological order matters, as long as you are enough qualified!

Laopa wrote:

Actually I don't know, but I don't think the chronological order matters, as long as you are enough qualified!

Chronological order does mean that you should first mention the oldest and last the newest.

And although they probably won't throw you out if you don't use the right order, don't forget that the applications will be graded also on how well documented they are:

http://ec.europa.eu/stages/information/preselection_en.htm#Infotab2

This may also include that you have followed the given instructions for filling in the application form & ordered the attachments accordingly etc.

So in some cases at the end this might make the difference of one point of being in or out at the preselection!

myrskypilvi wrote:

Laopa wrote:

Actually I don't know, but I don't think the chronological order matters, as long as you are enough qualified!

Chronological order does mean that you should first mention the oldest and last the newest.

And although they probably won't throw you out if you don't use the right order, don't forget that the applications will be graded also on how well documented they are:

http://ec.europa.eu/stages/information/preselection_en.htm#Infotab2

This may also include that you have followed the given instructions for filling in the application form & ordered the attachments accordingly etc.

So in some cases at the end this might make the difference of one point of being in or out at the preselection!

Looking to my application I have realized I respected the chronological order unknowingly, I'm happy

I thing the system is arranging them automatically in a chronological order!

tonita wrote:I thing the system is arranging them automatically in a chronological order!

Uff, I thought I was smarter

I am sure you are